Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Was building the 2010 stadiums a bad decision?


Feel it it’s here – well face it it’s gone! It’s gone and we have several beautiful and very expensive stadia left behind as one of the legacies of this wonderful event. I want to address this particular legacy. In future blogs we can interrogate the validity of the other legacies that should have been left as result of FIFA World Cup 2010.
 The Cape Times 29th may 2012 writes: 
World Cup Stadiums ‘could soon be white elephants’
Sports Minister Fikile Mbalula claims that communities are saying that they don’t have facilities yet we have massive stadiums that are underutilized because they are too costly to use.
Were we caught up in the euphoria of hosting the FIFA World Cup? Could all that money have been more wisely spent rather than on new stadia? Some argue that FIFA would not have agreed to the event if we did not build these stadia? Is this true?
What is your view? Tear them down and save the upkeep costs or what?
Dr Steve

1 comment:

  1. Wessel Dippenaar05/06/2012, 21:05

    What a waste that would be! We need to plan clever like Durban did with Moses Mabhida. Incorporating retail space into the stadium have ensured a steady income for them and continued development of the area will keep the stadium open for many years to come. Sad we couldn't get the Olympics as this would have given us a World Class sporting environment with awesome facilities for most of our sporting codes.

    ReplyDelete